Mixed-phenotype acute leukaemia with KMT2A rearrangement

From Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Haematolymphoid Tumours (5th ed.)

editHAEM5 Conversion Notes
This page was converted to the new template on 2023-12-07. The original page can be found at HAEM4:Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (MPAL) with t(v;11q23.3); KMT2A Rearranged.

(General Instructions – The main focus of these pages is the clinically significant genetic alterations in each disease type. Use HUGO-approved gene names and symbols (italicized when appropriate), HGVS-based nomenclature for variants, as well as generic names of drugs and testing platforms or assays if applicable. Please complete tables whenever possible and do not delete them (add N/A if not applicable in the table and delete the examples). Please do not delete or alter the section headings. The use of bullet points alongside short blocks of text rather than only large paragraphs is encouraged. Additional instructions below in italicized blue text should not be included in the final page content. Please also see Author_Instructions and FAQs as well as contact your Associate Editor or Technical Support)

Primary Author(s)*

Tracy Tucker, PhD, FCCMG

Cancer Category / Type

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

HAEM4:Acute Leukemias of Ambiguous Lineage

Cancer Sub-Classification / Subtype

Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia with t(v;11q23.3); KMT2A-rearranged

Definition / Description of Disease

Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) with t(v;11q23.3) results in KMT2A rearrangement with a number of different fusion partners and defines a subtype of MPAL, which are leukemias in which the blast cells show no clear differentiation along a single lineage and instead have both myeloid and lymphoid immunophenotypic markers[1].

KMT2A is commonly rearranged with 4q21.2 (AFF1), although other loci have been reported including 9p21, 9p22,10p12 and 19p13[2][3].

Synonyms / Terminology

Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia with MLL rearranged

Epidemiology / Prevalence

MPAL accounts for 2-5% of all acute leukemias[2], and the t(v;11q23) is one of two genetically defined entities in MPAL. MPAL with t(v;11q23) has been reported in both the adult and pediatric population[2][3].

Clinical Features

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instruction: Can include references in the table)

Signs and Symptoms EXAMPLE Asymptomatic (incidental finding on complete blood counts)

EXAMPLE B-symptoms (weight loss, fever, night sweats)

EXAMPLE Fatigue

EXAMPLE Lymphadenopathy (uncommon)

Laboratory Findings EXAMPLE Cytopenias

EXAMPLE Lymphocytosis (low level)


editv4:Clinical Features
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

MPAL with t(v;11q23) patients have a similar presentation to other patients with acute leukemia, and likely present similarly to patients with other acute leukemias with KMT2A rearrangement that have a high white blood cell count.

Sites of Involvement

Bone marrow

Morphologic Features

• Blasts must constitute 20% of all nucleated cells, but not necessarily of each distinct lineage.

• Blasts are dimorphic - resembling both lymphoblasts and myeloblasts.

Immunophenotype

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instruction: Can include references in the table)

Finding Marker
Positive (universal) EXAMPLE CD1
Positive (subset) EXAMPLE CD2
Negative (universal) EXAMPLE CD3
Negative (subset) EXAMPLE CD4


editv4:Immunophenotype
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

The diagnosis of MPAL rests on the immunophenotypic features of blasts rather than morphology and flow cytometry.

The following are criteria for assigning more than one lineage to a single blast population:

• Myeloid lineage – MPO by flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, or cytochemistry OR monocytic differentiation with two of the following: non-specific esterase, CD11c, CD14, CD64, lysozyme

• T-cell lineage – cytoplasmic or surface CD3 expression

• B-cell lineage – strong CD19 with one of the following strongly expressed: CD79a, cytoplasmic CD22, CD10 OR weak CD19 with two of the following strongly expressed:CD79a, cytoplasmic CD22, CD10

Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)

Put your text here and fill in the table

Chromosomal Rearrangement Genes in Fusion (5’ or 3’ Segments) Pathogenic Derivative Prevalence Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) EXAMPLE 3'ABL1 / 5'BCR EXAMPLE der(22) EXAMPLE 20% (COSMIC)

EXAMPLE 30% (add reference)

Yes No Yes EXAMPLE

The t(9;22) is diagnostic of CML in the appropriate morphology and clinical context (add reference). This fusion is responsive to targeted therapy such as Imatinib (Gleevec) (add reference).


editv4:Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

Almost all cases have a t(v;11q23) identified by karyotype analysis or a KMT2A break-apart by FISH analysis.

Chromosomal Rearrangement Genes in Fusion (5’ or 3’ Segments) Pathogenic Derivative Prevalence
t(4;11)(q21;q23) 3'AFF1 / 5'KMT2A der(11) Most common
t(9;11)(p22;q23) 3’MLLT3 / 5’KMT2A der(11)
t(10;11)(p12;q23) 3’MLLT10 / 5’KMT2A der(11)
t(11;19)(q23;p13.3) 3’MLLT1 / 5’KMT2A der(11)


editv4:Clinical Significance (Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapeutic Implications).
Please incorporate this section into the relevant tables found in:
  • Chromosomal Rearrangements (Gene Fusions)
  • Individual Region Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
  • Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns
  • Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)

Diagnostic:

• The presence of t(v;11q23) with mixed phenotype immune-profile is diagnostic of this cytogenetic subtype of MPAL.


Prognostic:

• t(v;11q23) MPAL has a poor prognosis, similar to other most other leukemias with KMT2A rearrangements.


Therapeutic target:

• No specific molecular targets

Individual Region Genomic Gain / Loss / LOH

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Includes aberrations not involving gene fusions. Can include references in the table. Can refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable.)

Chr # Gain / Loss / Amp / LOH Minimal Region Genomic Coordinates [Genome Build] Minimal Region Cytoband Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE

7

EXAMPLE Loss EXAMPLE

chr7:1- 159,335,973 [hg38]

EXAMPLE

chr7

Yes Yes No EXAMPLE

Presence of monosomy 7 (or 7q deletion) is sufficient for a diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes when there is ≥20% blasts and no prior therapy (add reference).  Monosomy 7/7q deletion is associated with a poor prognosis in AML (add reference).

EXAMPLE

8

EXAMPLE Gain EXAMPLE

chr8:1-145,138,636 [hg38]

EXAMPLE

chr8

No No No EXAMPLE

Common recurrent secondary finding for t(8;21) (add reference).

editv4:Genomic Gain/Loss/LOH
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

Not known in this specific subgroup.

Characteristic Chromosomal Patterns

Put your text here (EXAMPLE PATTERNS: hyperdiploid; gain of odd number chromosomes including typically chromosome 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 17; co-deletion of 1p and 19q; complex karyotypes without characteristic genetic findings; chromothripsis)

Chromosomal Pattern Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE

Co-deletion of 1p and 18q

Yes No No EXAMPLE:

See chromosomal rearrangements table as this pattern is due to an unbalanced derivative translocation associated with oligodendroglioma (add reference).

editv4:Characteristic Chromosomal Aberrations / Patterns
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

May exist as the sole abnormality or with secondary abnormalities. Given the rarity of cases, common secondary abnormalities have not been identified.

Gene Mutations (SNV / INDEL)

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: This table is not meant to be an exhaustive list; please include only genes/alterations that are recurrent and common as well either disease defining and/or clinically significant. Can include references in the table. For clinical significance, denote associations with FDA-approved therapy (not an extensive list of applicable drugs) and NCCN or other national guidelines if applicable; Can also refer to CGC workgroup tables as linked on the homepage if applicable as well as any high impact papers or reviews of gene mutations in this entity.)

Gene; Genetic Alteration Presumed Mechanism (Tumor Suppressor Gene [TSG] / Oncogene / Other) Prevalence (COSMIC / TCGA / Other) Concomitant Mutations Mutually Exclusive Mutations Diagnostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Prognostic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Therapeutic Significance (Yes, No or Unknown) Notes
EXAMPLE: TP53; Variable LOF mutations

EXAMPLE:

EGFR; Exon 20 mutations

EXAMPLE: BRAF; Activating mutations

EXAMPLE: TSG EXAMPLE: 20% (COSMIC)

EXAMPLE: 30% (add Reference)

EXAMPLE: IDH1 R123H EXAMPLE: EGFR amplification EXAMPLE:  Excludes hairy cell leukemia (HCL) (add reference).


Note: A more extensive list of mutations can be found in cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/), COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic), ICGC (https://dcc.icgc.org/) and/or other databases. When applicable, gene-specific pages within the CCGA site directly link to pertinent external content.


editv4:Gene Mutations (SNV/INDEL)
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

Not known in this specific subgroup.

Epigenomic Alterations

Not known in this specific subgroup.

Genes and Main Pathways Involved

Put your text here and fill in the table (Instructions: Can include references in the table.)

Gene; Genetic Alteration Pathway Pathophysiologic Outcome
EXAMPLE: BRAF and MAP2K1; Activating mutations EXAMPLE: MAPK signaling EXAMPLE: Increased cell growth and proliferation
EXAMPLE: CDKN2A; Inactivating mutations EXAMPLE: Cell cycle regulation EXAMPLE: Unregulated cell division
EXAMPLE:  KMT2C and ARID1A; Inactivating mutations EXAMPLE:  Histone modification, chromatin remodeling EXAMPLE:  Abnormal gene expression program
editv4:Genes and Main Pathways Involved
The content below was from the old template. Please incorporate above.

Genes:

KMT2A on 11q23.3 is transcribed from centromere to telomere. It encodes a transcriptional coactivator with two DNA binding motifs (an AT hook, and Zinc fingers), a DNA methyl transferase motif (SET domain), a bromodomain; transcriptional regulatory factor and nuclear localization. When KMT2A is part of a multiprotein complex, the SET domain specifically mediates methylation of Lys-4 of histone H3 (H3K4me) which is a tag for epigenetic activation and mediates acetylation of Lys-16 of histone H4 (H4K16ac).

AFF1 on 4q21.3 is transcribed from centromere to telomere. It encodes a transcription factor that regulates RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription through elongation and chromatin remodeling functions. This gene has been shown to promote the expression of CD133, a plasma membrane glycoprotein required for leukemia cell survival.

MLLT3 on 9p21.3 is transcribed from centromere to telomere. It encodes for a transcription factor that is part of the super-elongation complex (SEC) that increases the catalytic rate of RNA polymerase II transcription by suppressing polymerase pausing.

MLLT10 on 10p12.31 is transcribed from telomere to centromere. It encodes a transcription factor with both zinc finger and leucine zipper motifs.

MLLT1 on 19p13.3 is transcribed from centromere to telomere. It encodes for a transcription factor that is part of the super-elongation complex (SEC) that increases the catalytic rate of RNA polymerase II transcription by suppressing polymerase pausing.


DNA:

• 5' KMT2A - 3' AFF1 has variable breakpoints.

• 5' KMT2A - 3' MLLT3 has variable breakpoints.

• 5' KMT2A - 3' MLLT10 has variable breakpoints, however, given that MLLT10 is transcribed in the opposite direction to KMT2A, most result from a complex rearrangement.

• 5' KMT2A - 3' MLLT1 has variable breakpoints.


Protein:

• 5' KMT2A - 3' AFF1 fusion product consists of the AT hook and DNA methyltransferase from KMT2A fused to the AFF1 C-terminus on the derivative 11 and is predominantly located in the nucleus. The reciprocal AFF1-KMT2A on the derivative 4 may or may not be expressed.

• 5' KMT2A- 3' MLLT3 fusion product consists of the AT hook and DNA methyltransferase from KMT2A fused to the MLLT3 C-terminus on the derivative 11 and is predominantly located in the nucleus.

• 5' KMT2A - 3' MLLT10 fusion product consists of the AT hook and DNA methyltransferase from KMT2A fused to the MLLT10 leucine zipper on the derivative 11 and is predominantly located in the nucleus.

• 5' KMT2A - 3' MLLT1 fusion product consists of the AT hook and DNA methyltransferase from KMT2A fused to most of the MLLT1 gene.


Key cellular pathways:

• The partners listed above are all transcriptional regulators that are widely expressed. Regardless of the partner, the methyltransferase activity is lost in the KMT2A fusion product. Although the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated, the loss of methyltransferase activity results in epigenetic changes in the genome[4].

Genetic Diagnostic Testing Methods

• Chromosome analysis, FISH

• FISH is needed for cytogenetically cryptic cases with typical immunophenotype

Familial Forms

None

Additional Information

None

Links

KMT2A

References

(use the "Cite" icon at the top of the page) (Instructions: Add each reference into the text above by clicking on where you want to insert the reference, selecting the “Cite” icon at the top of the page, and using the “Automatic” tab option to search such as by PMID to select the reference to insert. The reference list in this section will be automatically generated and sorted. If a PMID is not available, such as for a book, please use the “Cite” icon, select “Manual” and then “Basic Form”, and include the entire reference.)

  1. Arber, Daniel A.; et al. (2016). "The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia". Blood. 127 (20): 2391–2405. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. ISSN 1528-0020. PMID 27069254.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Manola, Kalliopi N. (2013). "Cytogenetic abnormalities in acute leukaemia of ambiguous lineage: an overview". British Journal of Haematology. 163 (1): 24–39. doi:10.1111/bjh.12484. ISSN 1365-2141. PMID 23888868.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Yan, Lingzhi; et al. (2012). "Clinical, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular genetic features in 117 adult patients with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia defined by WHO-2008 classification". Haematologica. 97 (11): 1708–1712. doi:10.3324/haematol.2012.064485. ISSN 1592-8721. PMC 3487445. PMID 22581002.
  4. Johansson B and Harrison CJ (2009). Cancer Cytogenetics: Chromosomal and Molecular Genetic Aberrations of Tumor Cells, 3rd edition. Heim S, Mitelman F, Editors. John Wiley & Sons Inc: Hoboken, New Jersey, p84-87.

Notes

*Primary authors will typically be those that initially create and complete the content of a page.  If a subsequent user modifies the content and feels the effort put forth is of high enough significance to warrant listing in the authorship section, please contact the CCGA coordinators (contact information provided on the homepage).  Additional global feedback or concerns are also welcome. *Citation of this Page: “Mixed-phenotype acute leukaemia with KMT2A rearrangement”. Compendium of Cancer Genome Aberrations (CCGA), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), updated 12/13/2023, https://ccga.io/index.php/HAEM5:Mixed-phenotype_acute_leukaemia_with_KMT2A_rearrangement.